c++ - Rvalue references under the hood -


consider foo function

void foo(x x);

with x matrix cass, , function

x foobar();

suppose run

foo(foobar());

what happens temporary objects in case step step? understanding that

  1. foobar returns temporary object, xtemp1;
  2. foo copies xtemp1 temporary object of own, xtemp2, , destroyes xtemp1;
  3. foo performs calculations on xtemp2.

on other side, if overload foo as

void foo(x& x); void foo(x&& x);

then picture different and, in particular,

  1. foobar returns temporary xtemp1;
  2. foo not create new temporary, acts directly on xtemp1 through reference.

is picture correct or, if not, point out , fix mistakes? thank much.

foo(foobar());
  1. foobar's return value value, it's temporary value.
  2. 1this function move/copy return value local storage temporary.
  3. 1this function move/copy value in local storage parameter call foo.
  4. the call foo executes.
  5. 2as foo returns, it's parameter destructed.
  6. 2when foo returns, value in local storage destructed.
  7. foobar's return value destructed.

1 these moves/copies may elided compiler. means these copy/moves don't have happen (and compiler worth using elide them).

2 if moves/copies above elided, destruction of respective variables naturally unnecessary. since don't exist.

on other side, if overload foo as

  1. foobar's return value value, it's temporary value.
  2. 1this function move/copy return value local storage temporary.
  3. overload resolution selects foo(x &&) call.
  4. an rvalue-reference parameter variable created , initialized local storage value.
  5. the call foo executes.
  6. as foo returns, it's reference parameter destructed (not value references).
  7. 2when foo returns, value in local storage destructed.
  8. foobar's return value destructed.

note key differences here. step 4 , 6 cannot elided. therefore, if x small type int, function have no choice create worthless reference integer. references internally implemented pointers, it's not possible compiler optimize away register. local storage must therefore on stack rather register.

so guaranteed of fewer move/copies. again, decent compiler elide them. question is, x large fit register?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

css - Text drops down with smaller window -

i've adapted css use in website , can't quite figure out why 1 aspect of page acting way acting. basically, when shrink window below size horizontally, of text "drops down". becomes issue if user viewing website through ipad vertical orientation. can view issue here . i'm hoping make if window gets smaller, placement of text remains intact. the problem area not have enough space put both side navigation , content on 1 line. make automatically adjust page's width when exceeds decrements of width. this code example, , highly unlikely work. if see css more clearly, provide exact code. @media , (max-width:960px) { /* assuming #wrapper 960px across */ #content {width:560px;} /* opposed 720px */ } edit the content drops down @ 980px, have shrink width after there. @media , (max-width:980px) { #container {width:520px;} }
Read more

php - Boolean search on database with 5 million rows, very slow -

i have script when user searches "apples", there coloumn related searches "shiny apples", , "rotten apples", etc. problem searches database has 5,600,000 rows , mysql lagging badly. here code: $get = mysql_query("select keyword searches match (keyword) against ('".mysql_real_escape_string(preg_replace('#([\s]+)#', '$1', $title))."' in boolean mode) limit 0,15"); this taking long time process , have active website searches getting performed every second, can recommend me tips? thanks! you need indexes. have had experiences in past creating indexes got significant performance gain.
Read more

c# - DetailsView in ASP.Net - How to add another column on the side/add a control in each row? -

i have detailsview control on page used edit various fields of record, works in respect. i looking way add 1 column (and if works, why not more) right, absolutely read-only, show same fields of record comparison purposes. i aware there no obvious way such thing out of box detailsview . have looked other controls (transposed gridview , recommended formview , listview ), nothing satisfies. have special data binding setup using detailsview , can't out of without losing features. anyone on how "hack in" additional columns (for display only) on detailsview ? the solution have now, use second detailsview , visible set false in aspx. in code, make sure databind hidden detailsview hosts data third column first, initial detailsview named itemdetails . and in item created event, pass third column html rendering of hidden controls (in last code block) : protected void itemdetails_itemcreated(object sender, eventargs e) { if (dataite...
Read more